PDF
version
• PASTORAL
LETTER TO THE FAITHFUL OF THE SHERBROOKE ARCHIDIOCESE •
A
little over two years ago(April 2002), John Paul II delivered
the apostolic letter Misericordia Dei to the churches of the
world. The Holy Father envisioned «giving an immediate new impulse
to the sacrament of reconciliation». The letter does not
pretend to be a document of theological reflection on the entire
reality of the sacrament of reconciliation; rather it is an analysis
of certain aspects of the celebration of the sacrament of reconciliation.
There are two elements in this letter that entail the greatest pastoral
implications :
| |
1) «A complete and individual confession with absolution
constitutes the sole normal method by which a believer who
is aware of a serious sin is reconciled with God and with
the Church».
2) «Absolution for a group of penitents without a prerequisite
individual confession...cannot be given by general means unless
a danger of death threatens..(and)if there is a grave necessity». |
In
other words, collective absolution as we have practiced it in our
diocese and elsewhere in Quebec and in other parts of the world
can no longer be maintained.
The
shock felt by the faithful and by the priests is great. And it is
understandable. For nearly thirty years, the practice of collective
absolution has been widespread. As I wrote in a recent letter to
the priests, the positive effects of such a pastoral practice cannot
be overlooked. The celebrations have been carefully prepared, the
approach to forgiveness has been set and experienced in a context
of great hope and even of joy, and the biblical roots of reconciliation
have been made very clear. And the practice of this form of the
sacrament has helped to create a climate of inner calm among penitents
which was a comfort for those who had been victims, at one time,
of excessively severe attitudes on the part of some confessors.
The Church is now asking us to change our previous pastoral practice
and to emphasize individual confession or community celebration
with individual absolution. We are all aware of the implications
of such a change in our practices. If the Holy Father is asking
us to take this step, it is in order to renew the sacrament of pardon
which has a tendency to be deemed useless by a world which has lost
its sense of sin. Giving a new impulse to the approach to the sacrament
is, without doubt, a chance to open ourselves to a privileged expression
of divine mercy.
My
dear members of the diocese, we have to change the practice to
which we have become accustomed. By placing more importance on
the individual celebration and the community form with individual
absolution, we are rejoining the mainstream of the universal
Church. The Holy Father has spoken in its name, and he has also
spoken in the name of all the churches, everywhere in the world,
who are trying to welcome God’s mercy by using a sacrament
that is so rich in grace. Whit our previous practice, we achieved
some very beautiful things. By returning to a more individual
approach and to a community approach with individual absolution,
we are giving a new sense to what we have been doing.
I
want to encourage you not to reject the productive achievements
of the past, but to pursue greater ones in the future. It would
be desirable to continue to develop a community form of preparation
for the sacrament with individual absolution. It is a question of
having a formula that will keep the communal dimension that was
so much appreciated in our former practice.
Early
next year, we will propose training approaches adapted to the new
situation we are entering. Together, pastors and faithful, we will
find the best ways to live out, in an authentic fashion, the Christian
experience of reconciliation.
If
the Holy Father insists so strongly on a celebration with individual
absolution, it would be a good idea to examine his reasons. As is
usually the case, there are undoubtedly theological, sacramental
and psychological reasons. It is in moments like this that we are
invited to deeper reflection and to move towards clearer understanding.
In
our diocese, after the appearance of Misericordia Dei( 2002), some
of the faithful, in one parish, studied the apostolic letter They
presented it to their local parishioners. It seems that it was welcomed
in peace and that the penitential celebrations with individual absolution
were conducted to the satisfaction of the people. We could undoubtedly
take the same approach in each of our communities.
At
this point, we are in the process of digesting the contents of
the Holy Father’s letter. We will have to go farther both
to understand it better and to fit it into the numerous invitations
concerning the sacrament of reconciliation that we have received
going back to Paul VI.
It
should also be noted that this reversal does not put into doubt
the forgiveness of any sins that the faithful presented to our Lord
during our former services. Divine mercy is not constrained by the
forms we use to express the state of our souls.
In conclusion, I want to repeat what I wrote a few weeks ago (October
2004) : The sacrament of forgiveness will never be easy to swallow.
It demands so much from a person that that one would be tempted
to dispense with the form of the sacrament, its features, and the
difficulties that are inherent in its very nature.
May
our Lord grant us the illumination of His Spirit in order that we
may welcome the graces that this sacrament can provide.
Andre
Gaumond,
Archbishop of Sherbrooke |
|
|